Translate

Wednesday, July 13, 2016

Cameroon: Buea IVTC graduates told to think big in search of jobs!

Buea IVTC graduates and officials pose for the camera

By Christopher Ambe
The State-owned and skills-giving Buea- based Intensive Vocational Training Centre (IVTC) for Office Employees,  last June 24  in a joint graduation ceremony formally  passed out three batches of its good-for-the-job market trainees: the batches of 2013,2014 and 2015 numbering about 200.
But no matter how skilled graduates are in a highly competitive job market their chances of landing jobs are slim if they don’t market themselves.
Reason why John Atosoh, Southwest Regional Delegate for the Ministry of Employment and Vocational Training, who chaired the joint graduation ceremony on campus told the smiling graduates:
  “You are the ones now to create your paths to success, to employment…
 “You must think big and network, and not feel disappointed in the search of jobs .Go out searching for jobs and not spend precious time watching movies in the false hope that jobs will come and meet you in their comfort”
John Atosoh urges grads to be job creators
    Describing the graduates as  “fortunate because you  are graduating from an institution which has exceptionally trained you,”Mr. Atosoh  commended the Director of IVTC Buea, Madam Becky Limunga Effoe,for the visible capacity-building role she has been playing for several years now intended to help the State reduce  unemployment and enhance national development.
    The Delegate advised the grads not only to go searching for jobs but also to strive to become job creators, noting that professional training is the key to development.
He hailed the Cameroon government for making education a major priority, and threw the challenge to all to sacrifice their utmost for the country’s development.
   The Delegate used the ceremony to praise the Biya administration for making Limbe host of one of Cameroon’s only three Advanced Vocational Centres.
    In a welcome address earlier, IVTC Buea Director Becky Limunga Effoe,said the institution was one of six state-owned vocational training centers in the country;she added that IVTC Buea is special in that it offers a bilingual trainng.
   The Director disclosed that many of the graduates could not attend the ceremony “because they have had jobs already at home and abroad”,a declaration which drew thunderous applause from the audience.guo                   Madam Limunga Effoe noted that with a solid foundation in vocational training no child can be left behind in the job market. “Vocational training provokes work ethics and economic growth”, she said, adding that “it is the gateway to employment”
    The Director hoped that the” graduates would see brighter days because we know that the future is bright”
  She appealed to the public and companies to maximize IVTC training programmes, citing the General Manger of the Cameroon Development Corporation (CDC), the second employer after the Government, who told her that “The best secretaries CDC has now are from IVTC Buea”
    The key speaker at the event was development expert George Mofor, whose topic was “Passion To Productivity”
The motivational speaker told the graduates that nothing is more permanent in life than change, noting that everybody needs positive change.
As such, Mofor challenged the graduates to transform their diplomas into values.
   He assured them that they must face challenges in life, adding that such would only strengthen them for greater success in whatever they do. “You must defend your career fearlessly and in so doing the sky won’t be your limit to success but rather your springboard”, he told the grads, to applause.
Madam Becky Limunga Effoe (1st from left backing camera)awarding scrolls to grads
The diploma-award ceremony began with a divine service led by Rev,Jobera Nelson,on the  theme “The Best is still to come”.
    Drawing inspiration from the Bible book of Proverbs3:5-6, the Minister of God told the grads:”you are now equipped to explore the world; I charge you to be optimists…looking up to God for your dreams and aspirations to become realities.”
  IVTC offers training in the following specialties:office-automation secretaryship, Bilingual Secretaryship, computerized accounting, Accounting Secretaryship and computer maintenance.
    The decades-old IVTC offers nine-month diploma courses and admission into the institution is gained either through an entrance examination or through direct negotiations with the centre



Monday, July 11, 2016

UN recommendation for Marafa’s release from Prison :Counsel says Cameroon must comply !

By Christopher Ambe
 Barrister Ndiva Kofele kale and Distinguished Professor of Southern Methodist University (SMU) Dedman School of Law in the USA, who was lead defense counsel in the trial of  Marafa  Hamidou Yaya,former Secretary-General at  Presidency of Cameroon, has insisted that Cameroon is bound to respect the UN ruling that his client be set free  from his 20- year jail term.
Barrister, Prof Kofele kale
    Marafa  in April 2012 had been  slammed  a 25-year jail term   for embezzling $29 million dollars , money meant for the purchase of a presidential jet  for Cameroon;but he appealed against the judgment claiming he was innocent, and the appeals court recently reduced the sentence to a 20-year jail term.
    Marafa had been sentenced in April 2012 along with three others who also received the same sentence, including the former head of the now defunct airline Camair, Yves Michel Fotso
   But his lead counsel, kofele kale, who described Marafa’s trial and imprisonment as a travesty of justice and flagrant violation of his client’s human rights had vowed to use other international avenues to correct what he termed the miscarriage of justice.
  Convinced that Marafa was imprisoned without objective evidence or due process of law, Kofele kale filed a complaint to the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (WGAD), which after a critical review of the matter has confirmed that Marafa was arbitrarily imprisoned, and is calling for his immediate release.

  Kofele kale,an American-trained lawyer  now in Cameroon, told this reporter on July 7,in Buea that he was in Yaounde on July 6  and visited his client Marafa in prison ,adding “  we shared a meal to bring the end of Ramadan”

   He disclosed that Marafa is having some health problems but quickly noted that “His (Marafa’s) spirits are high after receiving such a powerful confirmation of his innocence from an international tribunal.

 “After four years in detention under very deplorable conditions.. it has taken a toll on his health and he is  beginning to have some problems with his eyes”

  Asked if the defense counsel lawyer was confident that Cameroon would respect the recommendation of the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (WGAD) that Marafa be released and compensated, kofele kale quipped, “Do they have a choice? If Nigeria did not the respect the Judgment of the ICJ on Bakassi what would have happened? You don’t pick and choose what you want to respect. If they did not want to respect it they would not have engaged in the contest.”
  Asked how soon he expects his client to be set free, the American-trained lawyer expressed optimism that his client Marafa will “be released sooner than later, particularly because of his health condition”
  Reacting to French Lawyer Lydien Eyoum,who has been amnestied by the Head of State,Kofele kale asked rhetorically, “ Have you been to Kondengui?
“So every one who is released from there we should all rejoice. You would recall that she also had a case before WGAD and they had ruled that her detention was arbitrary .But you know there are speculations that the French Government put in a lot of pressure on the government release her”


Friday, July 8, 2016

Late Professor Tazoacha Asonganyi's "Difficult Choices In A Failed Democracy

Prof. Tazoacha Asonganyi died at the age of 67 on July 4,2016 in Yaounde after an  illness

Critical review of Late Professor Tazoacha  Asonganyi's  book" Difficult Choices in a failed Democracy" by Marie A. Abanga*

Introduction:
     Marie A. Abanga is a daughter of the same soil as the eminent Professor; indeed I am a daughter of the same royal lineage. That notwithstanding, I read his memoir with a lot of attention to details, analysing with my own modest legal mind, information provided as coming from different sources. I was fortunately no longer a kid  by the time multipartism was 'allowed' in our political arena. I was actually already interested in becoming a lawyer, and followed current events with the excitement of the high school teen I was. Indeed, I remember pretty much a large part of the landmark Simpson trial, which I watched in the house of my uncle Alex Taku, a former die hard Sdf militant like Prof Asonganyi himself at the time. It was equally during this period that I observed and overheard their actions and discussions over party strategy and matter. Alex Taku I can recall, was at some point the propangada person for the party. The devotion I witnessed, the allegiance, the sacrifice, and even the near destruction of marriages and families, resulting from their engagements, seriously made me ponder if there wasn't more to all that than met the eye.
     I had therefore been looking forward to reading such a memoir by 'one of them', especially when I learnt of the 'ruptures within the hitherto beloved Sdf'.  To be honest, although I was happy with the advent of multipartism, the 'introduction of democracy' (whatever this meant in the context as used by the Head of State), and the passing of the Liberty Laws; I was concerned at the preparedness of the country and its citizens for such major changes. Indeed, unless it was only lip service, were these new parties going to be allowed to even 'dream of change'? Were they going to be able to actually 'see any such change coming and seize the opportunity'? Were their own leaders going to be any different from the ones we currently had? Talking about democracy, was it meant for real or to attract more world bank funding to put it this vain? Liberty Laws, hmm we can leave this at that because history and time have told and shown, needless for me to bother writing more.
     I am therefore honoured and humbled to have read this memoir and to write a review, at least the author I am could hide behind that cloak in attempting this essay. It is frankly also my expression of total admiration and gratitude to Prof. Asonganyi, for writing this memoir and for accepting his own share of the blame in the saga of what is still known as the Sdf.

vi My  review of Prof's memoir will be divided into the following sections:

  1. Prof T. Asonganyi the elder I know and read of;
  2. The struggle as conceived and expounded by the author;
  3. The difficulties within, (enemies dans la maison as the frenchman will say) and the difficult choices;
  4. Lessons to be learnt or taught?  The Prof moves and lives on...

Prof T. Asonganyi the elder I know and read of:

My maternal grandmother of blessed and revered memory was called Helen Atabongasaba, fondly known as 'Andepe' (Independence). She was one of the few dynamic women of her times who braved it with the lots of PM Kemcha and several others I can't afford to list all, to not only advocate for the independence of the Southern Cameroons from Nigeria, but who also worked closely with the then Fon Fontem Defang to help, fight and push for the development and emancipation of what is today known as the Lebialem Division. It was grandma who told me stories about the village, about the great Fontem dynasty she came from, about the noble and dynamic sons and daughters of the village like DD Asonganyi and of course Prof. Asonganyi. I recall going with Grandma to the Asonganyi family compound opposite my college in Fontem, when their dad passed away. That was one of my first vivid memories of Prof.
   During that ceremony, although I could not quite grasp what was going on, I saw him remove his cap and put it on his brother's head. Grandma later told me he was giving his 'chair which their father left him to his brother'. I admired him greatly for that since then. But before then, I knew Prof's family in Yaounde where my family also resided. As fate will have it, the marriage prof narrates as was made in heaven, was between him and a bosom friend of my mum's. They had equally gone to the same college in my village, the seat of wisdom college one of the best in the country today. This means their household was no novelty to my siblings and I. Theirs had four children, and so did ours. We visited each other's home sometimes every other day or even twice a day, and we have stayed close to this day.
     The Prof, I knew then was one who was often always reading. Gosh, you could sometimes have to keep telling him who you were each time you met him. At least, he responded with a welcoming oh my yes you are BB's child (BB – Bibiana Taku is my mum). I used to wonder if his children ever got to talk with him or even went anywhere with him. Simply put, I wondered the type of family man he was. The same like my own dad? Or a better one? There were some 'elites' from my division at the time in Yaounde and when I met any of them, I will listen more than I spoke (although I can also be a chatter box), you know the kind of wisdom you could pick up from these elders! With regards to Prof, the first time I went to his office in CUSS, I could barely see him behind the stack of books, materials and equipments, I was simply in awe.
    As if his occupations were not enough, one day I read it in the press that he was the new SG of the Sdf. The Sdf was the strongest opposition party in the country at the time and only the names and titles of some of those affiliated to the party, made you understand it was no 'fool's business'. So to me, being the SG of such a party meant 'you and sleep were reviewing your relationship' period. Indeed, I personally saw my uncle Alex Taku doze off for a minute or two on a few occasions in broad daylight while doing other things. But truth be told, I never doubted Prof's ability to do the job, I instead feared for the price he maybe didn't know he'll have to pay. I thought of the disillusionment that may arise if things didn't work out as planned, and I thought of the outcome if things did work out and he became say the next Prime Minister of Cameroon – why not!
     I therefore followed his parcour as closely and often as I could, read all sorts of articles and heard all sorts of hearsays, watched different TV programs and always just concluded by praying for more grace for himself and the other members of both my close and extended family members involved in this  'bitter and dirty politics'. Sometimes, the person I read of, was very different from the person I knew. Sometimes, it seemed he lived more on the 'public arena' than he did at home. Other times, he appeared stubborn and even daring and I used this think to myself, 'ha this politics can do wonders – for the Prof and his Father the Fon of Fontem to be in such opposing camps with the Prof daring to talk back at the Fon', only tells at what point 'democracy' is truly coming to our country.

The struggle as conceived and expounded by the author:
Prof an insider as he then was, has done a great job to narrate the struggle for 'democracy' in Cameroon, which resulted to a large extent in the advent of multipartism in Cameroon. Democracy as it often said, is never given but seized. This to me means that no one man can claim to bring democracy to a country or party, it already exists although suppressed by the 'greedy powers that be'. That is why it usually takes an opposition like Corazon's in the Philippines, to get the people to realize the powers they have and can use to unleash the 'democratic floodgates'. Prof succinctly expounds on this, he actually narrates how it all 'bloomed out' in Cameroon leading to the forceful creation of the Sdf party in the 90s.
    Prof tells us of their discussion meetings in London, and the different Think Tanks created on their return to the motherland. The struggles at the time were numerous and some included, the call for the creation of a division for his Fontem sub division, the creation of a GCE Board and the organization of free and fair elections by an independent electoral body to put it simply. In a nutshell, the people were fed up, they wanted change, and 'pregnant with meaning slogans' like 'Power to the People' or 'Suffer Don Finish' (as the acronym Sdf came to mean to the man on the street), were bound to rally the masses behind whichever charismatic leader was at the front of the ranks.
     In the SDF Chairman's own words during an interview he accorded the post newspaper on the 15th of July 2005, it was a brave and excellent thing that the Founding Fathers in the person of Siga Asanga and Ni John Fru Ndi hadn't been chicken-hearted. Their bravura led to the creation of the Sdf, whose existence should rightly be credited for the numerous slow but steady 'democratic changes' which have occurred in Cameroon since then.
    It is for the reader of Prof's memoir, to make his own opinion on the course the Sdf has chosen and charted since its creation, as well as the weight if any which has been given to the 'slogans' it is identified with. What I retain in my review, is the fact that the struggles before and after the Sdf in which Prof so selflessly militated, have not gone away. Probably some struggles have changed nature, name and face, but there are still numerous struggles within and out of the party. Indeed, it may appear that the struggles within the party has played a bigger and bitter role in reducing it to the 'sham and shambles' it seems to be today.

The difficulties within, (enemies dans la maison as the frenchman will say) and the difficult choices:
It is now history that Prof replaced Siga Asanga as SG of the Sdf, and it is on record that Siga Asanga didn't leave the party after a farewell gala nor to take up a new appointment in the party elsewhere. In a preceding paragraph, the Chairman himself says he signed the declaration of creation of the party with Siga Asanga, and praises both of them for not being chicken-hearted. Where then did the rupture between the two (or rather with the party if you care to distinguish it from the chairman) start? It is even told in the memoir that Siga Asanga is a cousin to the chairman. Is that the kind of division this politics and party was bringing to add to the already difficult situation in the country? And so it came to pass, that Siga Asanga made I believe the difficult choice, to leave and live, instead of hanging on and maybe losing even his own life to any cause. Fortunately, he wrote and handed over to Prof several memos and letters which came to make much sense later on.
    There henceforth came other struggles within, and they could easily become summarised with names. Maybe it was easier that way so that the authors or actors could fill in the search for 'enemies dans la maison' (ennemies in the house), an inevitability in an undertaking of such dimension especially when the hierarchy starts dictating instead of democratically exercising 'power'. And so we read in the memoir about internal struggles such as the Muna Matters, Ngwasiri vs Asonganyi, the Kale Motion, the Asapngu Assault and the bigger one Asonganyi vs Fru Ndi. From keenly reading the memoir, it seems that any divergence of opinions, or attempt to correct or call for a stringent interpretation cum application of the party manifesto or constitution etc, led to problems – with the Chairman. In each of the above cases, difficult choices had to and were made.
   What guided those choices is best known to the protagonists because even if they later on write about them, they may not be telling us all there is to it, what they say may be misrepresented by the press, or the language, grammar and choice of words cum their spelling could mare our proper understanding of their 'genuine or not so genuine motives'. My interest in this review is not to 'judge or give unsolicited advice', neither do I have any 'sound opinions' to make in the face of such 'difficult struggles and choices' which have personally torn my family  (both direct and extended) apart. The legal advisers of the party prosecuted they way they did, I may be a junior counsel but I don't think I envy them or their approach. With regards to Prof, he gave a press conference which unfortunately cost him more mud slings than he probably anticipated, he still went ahead to give interviews, and now he braves it to write this memoir. I salute him and sincerely thank him for preparing me to know there are both visible and invisible pitfalls in the political arena, and you better even watch out for outright 'juju' involvement -rumours or not...

Lessons to be learnt or taught?  The Prof moves and lives on…
     What are the lessons to be learnt from reading Prof's memoir? What are the lessons to be taught to future generations? I want to believe that Prof first and foremost wrote this memoir as a 'mea culpa'. You get to a point in life where you have so much in you that you just can't create more memory space in your internal disc. You need to release some of all that to an external memory drive and once more the difficult choice is which outlet or medium you pick. I discovered my passion for writing, and I have four memoirs to my credit. I wrote them as mea culpas and self therapies, but I hoped they would help someone somewhere. I therefore love reading memoirs for precisely the same reason. I get to learn a lot about the author, about the situations or scenarios they narrate and expound, and I am keen to learn some lessons.
     In addition to learning lessons, you have indirectly been taught lessons which you could pass on to others even by mere recommendation of that same work. I am sure Prof didn't write all in here, just so we don't have an encyclopedia instead. But, I believe strongly he learnt some harsh and hopefully soft lessons. He even admits that in other terms, and at the book launch I attended in Douala, Cameroon, he candidly said same when asked all those questions as to what he could have done differently, and why not sooner than later? Anyway, what is ever important when one goes through difficult situations and makes difficult choices, is the message you retrieve from the mess. It's the testimony you give out of the tests. It's the appointments you make following the disappointments. A game with words? Not really, because that seems to be what Prof has and is doing.
    He tells us since that the Sgship he has literary metamorphosed into a better and bigger intellectual – yes let him leave politics alone for he knows 'too much book' and that obviously irked the Chairman who reminded them countless times that 'Politics nobi Book' (politics does not equate to education – my simple interpretation), although I sincerely think you need some sound 'book keeping' (modern day management) principles to chair such an organization.
    Prof has moved on since then and is faring much better holistically from the look of things. He has written over 200 articles since then, is a much sought after prof emeritus in both the national and international scene, and now has time to dedicate to his family and above all himself. The awards have been coming in, as well the recognitions and admissions of poor judgement by some of those who threw the stones back in 2005/06.
    The party he left still staggers on, although it seems to have a better 'unholy' alliance with the ruling party and its leader now than it did back in the 90s.
   When I recently came across Prof at the Douala airport, I thought he looked much younger than when I last saw him some five years ago. Yet, not wanting to make him blush especially in the presence of his wife and children, I just kept my remark to myself and promised myself that I will use my freedom brought about by the 'liberty laws', to say it here that sometimes when you think your life will be finished if you lose something, it's actually that loss that could get you to start living.
In Conclusion
In our Christian parlance, it is sometimes said that 'when God doens't want you somewhere, he gives you a sack letter'. God doesn't do nothing by himself, he does it through people, things and events. I read that Prof had decided not to run for any NEC position again before his 'sagacite' dismissal from the party. Sadly, one of ours was 'manipulated' to step in via some illegal and undue process, as interim SG, although that too didn't last long. Several others have since then written memoranda especially expressing their disillusionment with the way party affairs are being handled, and some have unfortunately been disciplined for that effort. Several others in the Lebialem division 'crossed the carpet' over to the CPDM in their numbers, and although this may be 'considered' an offshoot of the treatment given Prof their 'son', that's simply the un-permanent nature of life, and another indication that something needs to be done about the tumour growing in the anals of the party.
   Sir, you may not be on the scale of Mandela nor Ghandi, neither are those your names nor do I think that was your ambition. You are just you, and you have and are doing your best. Your generosity in writing and causing to be published this memoir, contributes to your legacy. I will not hesitate to recommend your memoir to others, not because I know you personally, but because the lessons to be learnt and taught from within, are even worth an inscription into the Cameroonian history curriculum if that were possible.


About Professor T. Asonganyi (1951 - 2016)
Professor Tazoacha Asonganyi, was one of Cameroon's Lead Biochemists. He was a  Professor at the faculty of Biochemistry and medical science for over 25 years at the university of Yaounde 1 in Cameroon, where he trained thousands of  medical students. He equally was a prolific political commentator and critic, churning out hundreds of articles in his less than seven decades of existence. His Memoir: CAMEROON; DIFFICULT CHOICES IN A FAILED DEMOCRACY published last year remains one of the only objective write ups depicting a true political story line in Cameroon. Prof was equally one of the most objective political minds in the Cameroon and served as the most vibrant Secretary General of the SDF between 1994-2005. For his strong stands against corruption and dictatorial tendency by both the SDF and Ruling CPDM Leadership, he fell out with both camps. Indeed, the Prof Emeritus has bowed out of the arena although his legacy will live on forever.
NB: Marie A. Abanga  is several things in one.She is Barrister and Solicitor; Author; Consultant; Prince 2 Certified Project Manager; Country Director Gbm Foundation for Epilepsy and Mental Wellbeing …

Thursday, July 7, 2016

Cameroon:U.N. Body Declares Marafa Hamidou Yaya’s Imprisonment Constitutes Arbitrary Detention in Violation of International Law

At its 75th session that held at the United Nations Headquarters in New York from April 18-27, the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (WGAD) ruled that the detention of the Cameroonian political prisoner, Marafa Hamidou Yaya, is unlawful. Following its practice, the WGAD’s findings were disclosed first to the Government of Cameroon (GOC) two weeks before communicating them to Marafa’s lawyer on Monday, June 27, 2016. The decision comes on the heels of the recent judgment handed down by Cameroon’s highest court reducing Marafa’s prison sentence from 25 to 20 years for his role in the abortive purchase of a presidential aircraft for President Biya’s travels

Marafa Hamidou : Gaining freedom soon?
Marafa Hamidou Yaya’s attorney, Professor Ndiva Kofele Kale, a legal academic and practitioner [member of the Cameroon Bar and licensed to practice before the Supreme Courts of the United States and the State of Illinois] who focuses on Human Rights Protection and International Criminal Law, cited the Government of Cameroon before the U.N. Working Group in June 2015 for violating his client’s right to a fair trial among other internationally-protected fundamental human rights. On July 1st the WGAD requested the GOC to submit its reply memorial which it did on September 30th. Marafa’s counsel followed up with a rejoinder to the Government’s submission on November 13, 2015. Because of the large amount of documents both parties filed in support of their respective positions, it took the WGAD between November 2015 and April 2016 to deliberate on the Marafa petition before finally issuing its opinion in June.

The United Nations body has demanded that he be released immediately and be awarded compensation by the GOC for the harm caused by being deprived of his liberty. The Working Group established that Mr. Marafa’s detention violates Articles 9 and 10 of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights as well as Articles 9 and 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. In its decision the WGAD recommends that if the Cameroon Government can come up with legitimate grounds for a new trial then Marafa should be given one where all his due process rights will be scrupulously respected. It urged President Biya’s government to take diligent steps to address Marafa’s failing health which is worsening to the point of becoming irreversible. It then referred the decision to Monica Pinto, the Special Rapporteur of the Human Rights Council on the Independence of Judges and Lawyers, for appropriate action.

Asked to comment on the decision, Professor Kale had this to say:

“The decision of the Working Group vindicates my client and confirms what he has always said that he is innocent of all the charges leveled against him. But before professional talking heads spin this momentous decision out of control, let me make three observations. First, unlike the Thierry Atangana and Lydienne Eyoum cases where the Cameroon Government did not bother to file any pleadings, in this case the Government not only filed but even requested a 60-day extension to prepare its reply to my preliminary submission. Both the Government’s and the complainant’s submissions were backed by supporting documents. As a matter of fact these documents were so voluminous that they contributed in prolonging the deliberations of the Working Group. It is therefore important to note that we don’t have here a judgment in default but the reasoned outcome of a contested dispute where both parties were allowed to lay out their case. And the five distinguished jurists who comprise the Working Group had before them the same set of documents as the prosecutors who indicted Marafa, as the judges of the Mfoundi High Court who declared him guilty and the venerable justices of our Supreme Court who confirmed the judgment of the lower court. Yet after reviewing the same evidence, the panel of jurists on the Working Group came to the opposite conclusion! How did our jurists get it wrong? Perhaps it is the search for an answer to this question that the Working Group decided to refer their decision to the U.N. Special Rapporteur on the Independence of Judges for further probing. In any event, it does not speak well of Cameroon’s judiciary as this referral now puts in doubt its vaunted claims of independence and impartiality. My second observation is that inasmuch as Cameroon is a State party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, she is legally bound by this decision and cannot refuse to execute it. Finally, it remains my hope that President Biya will do the right thing and instruct his Government to abide by the UN ruling against it and take the steps that are necessary to bring Mr. Marafa’s arbitrary and unjust detention to an end. At issue here is Cameroon’s willingness to respect the Rule of Law not only in theory but in actual practice as well. It must demonstrate evidence of that willingness by resisting the temptation of aligning itself with those rogue states that flout the decisions of international tribunals and by so doing become complicit in weakening the global/international community’s efforts to protect some of the most vulnerable victims of human rights violations!”

Under the authority of the U.N. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, the WGAD was established in 1991 to investigate and adjudicate whether states are in compliance with their international human rights obligations. It receives submissions from the individual complainant and the respondents (the states), and decides whether the case amounts to arbitrary (that is to say unlawful, or prohibited) detention. It will be recalled that the WGAD had earlier ruled against the Cameroon Government in Michel Thierry Atangana Abega v. Cameroon, WGAD, Opinion No. 38/2013, U.N. Doc. A/HRC/WGAD/2013/38 (2014) and Pierre Roger (alias Lapiro) et al. v. Cameroon, WGAD, Opinion No. 32/2011, U.N. Doc.  A/HRC/WGAD/2011/32 (2011). The WGAD decision on Marafa which is legally binding will now be reported to the United Nations Human Rights Council. 
Source:  United States Friends for MARAFA Committee, Atty. Zena Crenshaw-Logal





SEARCH THIS SITE