ByTazoacha Asonganyi in Yaounde
These last weeks,
we have been inundated with information in national and international news
outlets about the sealing of the premises that host Foundation Radio Bamenda,
by order of the Mezam SDO Nguele Nguele Felix. This was said to be due to the
airing during its “Good Morning Bamenda Show,” of an interview with two guests
said to be of the Southern Cameroons National Council (SCNC). Nguele Nguele obviously
derived the power to carry out such brazen action from Law N° 90/054
of December 19, 1990 on the maintenance of law and order. The law in its
application is not different from the 1962 repressive ordinance which the
“freedom law” is said to have replaced. The action is directed at the SCNC: to
make it impossible for the group to express their views, since this will
frighten news media from opening their news outlets to those who profess to be
linked to the SCNC in one way or the other.
Law
N° 90/054 of December 19, 1990 gives wide-ranging powers to administrative
authorities to requisition people and goods, without specifying the category of
persons and goods to be requisitioned. Thus, since 1990, the administrative
authorities have used the powers to prohibit freedom of movement, and deprive
citizens of their right of ownership of property; and to arrest and detain
citizens for exercising their liberties and freedoms, categorizing citizens as
bandits and vandals - terms whose definitions are not self-evident in the law.
What the CPDM regime has presented to the
nation as “Vision 2035” claims that the main challenge facing Cameroon is “to
consolidate democracy and enhance national unity” and to bring “together the
various components of society…” We are
also told that “Cameroon is built out of many sociological groups (which) if
poorly controlled, can lead to the country’s disintegration…”
Thus,
regime claims that one of the uncertainties about its “vision” is the “emergence
and development of centrifugal forces”; and one of the “threats, risks, and
obstacles” is the “management of the dual Anglophone-francophone heritage.” They also say that fighting
against the centrifugal forces will require “discouraging
and eradicating primary loyalties from various origins…
that are clearly contrary to the law and cohabitation…” and “constantly having
an eye on groupings likely to ignite tensions and cast doubt on national unity.”
The “vision” further claims that “Over the
years, Cameroonians skillfully succeeded in ensuring original cohabitation
between the English-speaking and French-speaking systems…(but) the country is
still fragile as evidenced by some events that occurred in the past like…..the
violent representation of remote identities as well as outbreak of tensed or
even irredentist conflicts...
And
so the vision has as one of its ambitions to create “… a united and indivisible
nation enjoying peace and security…” rooted in “the
willingness of living together and overcoming together all adversities…”
We are also to in the “vision” that “…an
effective democracy implies: (i) promotion of the rule of law; (ii) respect of
human rights; (iii) accessible justice; (iv) fight against impunity and corruption.
The rule of law is the essence of a credible and equitable judicial system that
is independent and transparent, competent and accessible….” And so on!
There is a Chinese saying that a journey of a thousand miles
begins with the first step; even the longest and most difficult ventures have a
starting point. We are being told by a regime that has been
around for over 50 years that this time around, management of the life of the
nation will be based on laws that derive from the powers and responsibilities
delegated to the three branches of government – legislative, executive, and
judicial – provided by the constitution imposed on the country by the regime
since the 1960s. The constitution has since provided and still provides that the
legislative branch originates/adopts legislation that becomes laws; the
executive branch administers the laws with a president (head of the executive
branch) who can issue decrees having limited legislative powers; and the
judicial branch interprets the laws. This division of powers and
responsibilities ensures a system of checks and balances.
While our age-old regime promises to adhere to
these constitutional provisions, it turns around and seals business places
without a court order, deriving powers from anti-constitutional laws that give
judicial powers to partisan and half-educated administrators! The action of
Nguele Nguele and his kind can only send a chill of apprehension to the international
community expected by “Vision 2035” to bring foreign direct investment (FDI) to
contribute to the making of the much toted “emerging country.”
Of
course, we are told that fighting against centrifugal forces will require “discouraging
and eradicating primary loyalties from various origins…
that are clearly contrary to the law and cohabitation…” and keeping “…an eye on
groupings likely to ignite tensions and cast doubt on national unity.” But this
must be based on the rule of law, not on the whims and caprices of a
self-interested executive branch.
The famous “vision” tells us that it was
developed by “(i) identification of issues and key factors, (ii) structural
analysis of such issues and, (iii) development of general and contrasted
alternative scenarios for the country’s potential future” to make Cameroon a
strong, united, industrialized emerging country. We expected that at the end of
such process that led to “vision 2035,” the regime would have identified causes
and addressed them rather than fight results and effects of such causes. There
have been many errors of commission and omission that have dented the October
1961unification adventure. Such errors should have been seriously examined and
addressed rather than indulging in such brazen actions of closure of business
places and arrest and detention to force Anglophones to reconcile with a state
of affairs most of them refuse to reconcile with. No force in human history, no
“vision” has ever succeeded in blunting the human yearning for justice,
freedom, and liberty; it is neither “Vision 2035” nor actions related to it
that will.
The regime knows that radio and television
talk shows will always be used to advance the education of citizens; it knows that
during such shows, panels of experts promote ideas by “discussing” them.
There
are always points and counter-points, with both pro and con participants airing
their support or opposition to highlight a subject the public needs to understand.
Excuses like “the talk show Coordinator, as an informed and patriotic
Cameroonian who through his fine journalistic prowess let his guests understand
how unfounded, illegitimate and illegal the SCNC struggle was,” are uncalled
for because they give the impression that if the contrary were the case, the
thoughtless action of Nguele Nguele would have been understandable. The regime should not think that it
has a monopoly of such talk shows.
In the society that “Vision 2035” claims to
look forward to establishing, opposition parties, advocacy and pressure groups
will use them too. Such democratic space should be regulated by the rule of
law, not the whims and caprices of half-baked people the regime churns out from
ENAM that have a very weak concept of justice, liberty, and freedom.
No comments:
Post a Comment