Translate

Tuesday, September 29, 2020

Barrister Felix Agbor Nkongho."The Major National Dialogue was just a means to an end"


Barrister Felix Agbor Nkongho was president of Cameroon Anglophone Civil Society Consortium, which coordinated civil disobedience at the start of the Anglophone Crisis. The Biya government arrested him in January 2017 and detained for eight months in Yaounde.
 

Barrister Agbor Nkongho participated in the 2019 Major National Dialogue (MND).Just a few days to the MND’s first anniversary he shared his views on the Dialogue with The Horizon’s Contributing Editor, Christopher Ambe, in Buea.

Excerpts:

Barrister Agbor Nkongho, you took part in the Major National Dialogue (MND) which held from September 30 to October 4, 2019 in Yaoundé. In a few days, it will be the first anniversary of the MND. Is there any reason for celebration?

There is a cause for celebration in the sense that for a long time in the history of this country, people of divergent views came together to try to find solutions to the Anglophone crisis and the other problems that we face as people in Cameroon.

But substantially, I don’t see any reason for celebration in the sense that the Dialogue was tele-guided by the Government. If you look at the composition of various groups and how people were selected, it was clearly something that was controlled by Government. In that regard, it is not something to celebrate.

 If you look at the way national dialogues have been organized in other parts of the world, they take into consideration the holistic approach, where invited parties have inputs. In our case, every suggestion that was presented in the pre-dialogue consultations was not taken in to consideration during the MND.

 But in terms of the outcome, the big thing was the “special status”, which ushered in a lot of euphoria on the one side and skepticism on the other. What has really been the outcome of this special status? It is an empty shell; more cosmetic but in effect, nothing is really happening. Concerning Special Status, there isn’t much to write home about.

 Reconstruction was also a recommendation but nothing has been done yet.  I understand measures have been put in place to ensure that reconstruction and construction begin. May be something good can come out of it depending how they implement it.

What were your expectations from the Dialogue?

 I did not expect that the conflict that has taken place for years would have a solution in five days. But I also expected genuine and frank dialogue; I expected discussion that would go beyond the themes of the National Dialogue. I expected that if the organizers were honest they would know that the problems had gone beyond this unitary decentralization; I thought we would ,at least, have a discussion on federalism but unfortunately, the Dialogue looked like a well-scripted play to suit the whims and caprices of the powers that be.

 The idea of the MND was mainly to seek solutions to the socio-political crisis in the Northwest and Southwest regions. Closing the Dialogue, the Prime Minister said proposals made therefrom could only be truly implemented in an atmosphere of Peace. Have you noticed any return of peace and security?

 Peace and security flip-flops, depending on where you are. When October is coming closer, the security situation in [Anglophone Cameroon] is tense or during elections, like what happened during parliamentary and municipal elections. The security situation here in the Southwest seems to be getting better, but in the Northwest it is getting worse.

The Government must be sincere so people see that while we do reconstruction we are also trying to find out the solution to the crisis, by talking to the people we don’t agree with.

 You see, when information filtered out that, Sisiku Ayuk Tabe( the imprisoned Interim President of the Republic of Ambazonia)  was negotiating with Government, one could get the euphoria on the social media; for the sake of peace, people wanted him to go ahead; they did not know about the “infighting” in Government until when the Minister of Communication  announced that nothing was happening. There is urgent need for Government and for those who have taken arms against the State to put the interest of the people first, in whatever actions they take.

Would you recommend the holding of a second Major National Dialogue?

The Major Dialogue was a step in the right direction. It was a means to an end, and not an end in itself!  To me, there are supposed to be a series of dialogues before we come out of this quagmire...

We knew why the Dialogue was called; but the government wanted to give it national coloration which was not necessary.

 I understand the State wanted to show that, it could not be bullied by people who have taken up arms .There is an Anglophone problem and other problems.

 To me, they have done the national dialogue where we agreed on things that touched the entire territory; but now, let us go to the specific issues of the Northwest and Southwest regions. During the dialogue a lot of people there were CPDM people, thinking alike. But such a conference required also people of different ideologies-I mean some major Players like Ikome Sako. They might not come but they have people in Cameroon who can represent them so that they feel involved.

  When you invite people from the Diaspora to come for Major Dialogue and a few days before  to it ,you arrest somebody in Cameroon who uses the media to criticize Cameroon and you term him a separatist, are you not  sending a message to the others willing to come ,not to.

 

Which of the MND recommendations do you like most and why?

Be to honest, the one I like most is the “Special Status” for Anglophones. Why? Because it will give us some autonomy like what is happening in Monacco ,Quebec... The special status was the closest to what some of us have been clamoring for. And if you have a genuine special status, it can go a long way to make people feel empowered, that they can elect their governors and manage their affairs.

Reconstruction is good. You cannot wait until the conflict ends before you do that. I ask my separatist friends, “Let us assume that we are going to have a state tomorrow, are we not going to benefit from the roads?” There are things that we just have to look at the interest of the people and- as leaders, allow them to be done.

The Diaspora has been very instrumental in the Anglophone crisis. How can they be helpful to the return of peace and normalcy back home?

Unfortunately, when we talk about the Diaspora, during the crisis, we only see them in the negative .But we have some of the finest Diasporas, very resourceful to and supportive of families back home; in periods of crisis they pay school fees to family members. I think we have to encourage them to do more for the development of the country.

But also, we have to be honest in this country. When you ban someone from coming to the country they consider as theirs, they may destroy to have a new country. Imagine a Cameroonian resident in the Diaspora who loses the father back home but is not allowed to return for burial. Why the blacklisting of people abroad? I urge that State to grant general clemency to our citizens. Consider this issue of dual nationality where some Cameroonians abroad wishing to return are refused visas at the embassies. What is wrong if the state declares that Cameroonians by birth abroad whether with a foreign passport don’t need a visa to come to Cameroon? They cannot invest in a country where they are not sure to have access to it.

We have to engage our Diasporas. Why is there always tense relationship between the Government and the Diaspora? We need to have a minister in charge of Diaspora Affairs so that they should establish that working and brotherly relationship.

But also, some of our brothers and sisters in the Diaspora at times have very bad attitudes. It is not because you are abroad that you say all kinds of nasty things about Cameroon. The problem with this crisis is that, the people abroad think that they are all-knowing. They try to victimize everybody who lives in Cameroon and at the end we are where we are. Realistically, we need to work together; there need to be a synergy between our leaders abroad and those in Cameroon. We cannot have a revolution where everybody who matters is abroad, trying to blackmail or tarnish the image of everyone in Cameroon.

So the state should do something so that our Diasporas should feel Cameroonian. Feeling frustrated by the State, they have turned to support those fighting against Cameroon. Government should see how to use the Diaspora for the betterment of the Country

 (This Interview was first published in The HORIZON Newspaper, Cameroon of September 28,2020)

 

No comments:

SEARCH THIS SITE