By Professor Asonganyi Tazoacha
One, May 20 reminds us of totalitarianism, not consensus. Its inventor
thought he was doing the right thing, but it has since become obvious that he
lost sight of how and why unification happened. Its inventor had an ego that
did not tolerate any conversation about our destiny, and thought that the only
road was straight ahead. What looked to him and his sycophants as sound
strategy now looks like a betrayal. There are more roads than one. May 20 needs
to go, to give way to collective reflection on the right road to take.
Two, The Marxist dream of complete unity was the
premise for the authoritarian experiment that followed in the USSR. Its
repudiation of pluralism caused the collapse of the communist system after 70
years of experimentation. The same unity ideas generated the one-party
mindset that gave birth to the May 20 mindset. It has in turn given birth to inertia
and complacency - what others have described as a “can't, won't, and
shouldn't" mentality that blocked the USSR and led to its collapse. May 20
has to go, to end the culture of resting on our laurels year after year and
looking forward to mysteries!
Three, The one-party mind-set gave birth to May 20 by
artificially suppressing differences, uniting everything and wrapping it all in
alienating names and symbols, to the extent that the unification idea has
become revolting to an important component of the population that feels
excluded and colonized, and no longer feels bound to accept the new symbols and
contracts. May 20 appears now like a neat picture forced on a complex society
to suffocate relevant factors that do not seem to fit in the one-party logical
mode of thinking; it was meant to clear a messiness that interfered with an
imaginary, malleable whole wished by shortsightedness that saw the rest of us
as subjects, not citizens. That is why May 20 has never been a glue that holds all
of us together; it has never been an idea around which all the people mobilize,
because it ignored group sensitivities and has no genuine interest in what
other people think, and why they think the way they think.
Four, Deng Xiao Ping famously said that the development strategy of China was
like crossing a river by feeling the stones. By this he was saying that
experimentation always produces positive and negative results; and the negative
results always lead the way to positive results. By all measures, May 20 has
turned out to be a negative result of an experiment. After 40-some years, it
has thrown up vistas that many have seen and many may not have seen yet. May 20
should go, so we can have tough conversations about how to manage the fallouts
of its legacy.
Five, When
we held the Tripartite Conference in the ‘90s, it was supposed that our
understanding of our constraints and our human condition would lead us to take
responsibility for the general outcome of our efforts, and agree on what to
do next together,
and on a common path to take to make what had not yet happened to happen from
then. It had to result in a sort of “Yaounde Consensus.” Unfortunately, the
one-party-cum-May 20 mindset turned it into a ruse to set personal agendas and
fulfill personal ambitions. May 20 should go, to give way to a new “Consensus”
that will set a new agenda for today and the future, release citizen ingenuity, and
maximize citizen choices.
Six, Cameroonians of the May 20 era only see vanity
and sybaritism in their leaders today. They think only about castles, and fat
foreign bank accounts acquired without effort. They do not know that what we
call government money is their money, and that the government in power is
supposed to hold the money in trust for them. They do not know that the money
should be managed and guarded diligently to serve the people who own the money.
This is because the May 20 mentality has alienated the state from the people. May
20 has to go, to give way to a new era of new consciousness and a new system of
values that appreciate the concept of democracy, respect law and order, respect
the rule of law, respect merit and competition… May 20 has to go, so we can promote
the understanding that the only reason to be in government is to unlock the
people’s potential through unleashing the country’s potential in industry.
Seven, Our institutions of the May 20 era lack
integrity and fairness because people with an obsession for corruption and
theft and selfishness have barricaded themselves in centralized state
structures using self-serving laws fabricated by them to exclude the rest of
the people from having a say. May 20 should go, to usher in people with the
spirit of selflessness who will wholeheartedly hammer out new rules of
engagement that serve the nation, not an individual.
Eight, The May 20 mind-set has made society to be increasing
dependent on slogans, motions, and the rampant cooking and falsification of
figures in all domains, with the hope of magical transformation, rather than
studious hard work. It has left the strong impression that achievement can be
willed into existence by slogans, motions, and manipulation of figures, rather
than rigorous actions spurred by effort. May 20 should go, so that we can
regenerate the feeling that development is not a pious wish, but an imperative
that can only be achieved by effort.
Nine, Everybody knows that democracy is a vehicle
for promoting rapid development and improving the quality of life of citizens
through good, efficient and responsible governance. When Foncha and his peers fought
for unification with the wish to bring democracy to their brothers, they saw
democracy as the avenue to win power, institute democratic governance, and
deepen the democratic culture in a decentralized structure where states would
run their own show. May 20 is about the alienation of that vision and dream, and
the institution of centralized governance that has aggravated poverty,
unemployment, bad roads, poor quality of education, corruption, bad leadership,
poor healthcare, access to potable water, and robbed people of their dreams. May
20 should go, to allow Cameroonians to face the new African millennial
challenge defined by Bill Clinton – to build a capacity which will enable the
people to live to make their own progress and save their own future in a system
that rewards intelligence and hard work.
Ten, May 20 - “Unification” – has become like
Benjamin Disraeli’s “moderation” – a virtue to limit the ambition of our
founding fathers and to console undistinguished people for their want of
fortune and their lack of merit. It has foisted leaders on us that appropriate
patriotism without any rigour by declarations, rather than by diligent,
faithful, wholehearted work for the country. Let May 20 go, so that we can
truly have a “republic” where politics is deliberative and public; where
decisions are continuously questioned; where politics can never come to some
arrangement that makes further debate and discussion no longer necessary.
Future
generations will likely remember May 20 as a development that undermined the
unification project. Either it goes and we reform the state
for a better union, or the state will kill the union! As May 20 goes, it should
go with a whole
generation of leaders.
No comments:
Post a Comment