After an article in The Recorder Newspaper of October 28, 2013 titled Ex-Governor Tanjong dismisses claim he was elected MP without enrolling as voter, Hon. Ayah Paul (one of Cameroon’s career magistrates of Exceptional Class)who is the Secretary-General of People’s Action Party (PAP), whose Parliamentary Candidate Akoson Raymond made the allegation that the ex-governor did not register as a voter, has written a strong rejoinder to The Recorder in which he describes the above mentioned newly elected MP’s as dishonourable. Below is the rejoinder:
Dishonorable Enow Tanjong and Igelle Elias
BY Hon. AYAH P ABINE
Hon Ayah Paul |
The point is that when rumours started circulating that Enow Tanjong had not been registered on the electoral rolls, I gave myself the assignment to investigate the matter. It may interest the readers to know that I have been a legal official, carrying out criminal investigation on the ground for years. In my enquiries, I did find out that Enow Tanjong truly had not been registered
But when
CPDM made it public that he was the party’s candidate for Upper Bayang (in
Manyu Constituency), Enow Tanjong hurriedly had himself registered by the Buea
ELECAM Municipal Branch, and a voter’s card was issued to him.
By Cameroon’s electoral code, it is not competent of the Buea branch of ELECAM to register anyone or to issue a voter’s card for a polling station outside the Buea Municipality, let alone for far-off Fotabe in Upper Baying.
By Cameroon’s electoral code, it is not competent of the Buea branch of ELECAM to register anyone or to issue a voter’s card for a polling station outside the Buea Municipality, let alone for far-off Fotabe in Upper Baying.
Brandishing
a voter’s card today for Fotabe simply implies one of two instances of criminal
conduct. The one case is that the card is a forgery for having been issued by
Buea that did not have jurisdiction ratione loci over Fotabe. In the second
place, if the card for Fotabe was issued by the Upper Bayang ELECAM Municipal
Branch after that of Buea had been issued, it amounted to double registration,
contrary to the law. To repeat in summary, both cases are criminal. … Horrible
acceding to an honourable office over a threshold where fumes of criminality
gyrate!
As for Dishonourable “Chief” Igelle Elias, it was conspicuous fraud!
My findings are that Igelle went into a fraudulent deal with some treasury staffer in Buea whereby Igelle was given two blank receipts for whatever consideration. When the treasury boss discovered that two treasury receipts were unaccounted for, he raised hell and the fraud filtered to the public. Igelle quickly returned one of the receipts that was still blank and retained the one he had filled in. (The latest information we have is that the one filled in has now been returned to the treasury and that the sum filled in is 2.7 million).
If Igelle tells The Recorder today that he paid the deposit at Mamfe, that brings out his criminal conduct all the more. If he did pay at Mamfe, it does mean that when Igelle’s raw fraud in Buea was discovered and the blank receipt was returned, “smart” Igelle immediately turned to Mamfe for a cover-up. And if he had paid at Mamfe, what was Igelle’s motive for procuring two blank treasury receipts when Igelle as a “stores accountant” knows very well that receipts never issue in blank in financial transactions? What in short was the motive? … The answer is blowing in the wind!
As for Dishonourable “Chief” Igelle Elias, it was conspicuous fraud!
My findings are that Igelle went into a fraudulent deal with some treasury staffer in Buea whereby Igelle was given two blank receipts for whatever consideration. When the treasury boss discovered that two treasury receipts were unaccounted for, he raised hell and the fraud filtered to the public. Igelle quickly returned one of the receipts that was still blank and retained the one he had filled in. (The latest information we have is that the one filled in has now been returned to the treasury and that the sum filled in is 2.7 million).
If Igelle tells The Recorder today that he paid the deposit at Mamfe, that brings out his criminal conduct all the more. If he did pay at Mamfe, it does mean that when Igelle’s raw fraud in Buea was discovered and the blank receipt was returned, “smart” Igelle immediately turned to Mamfe for a cover-up. And if he had paid at Mamfe, what was Igelle’s motive for procuring two blank treasury receipts when Igelle as a “stores accountant” knows very well that receipts never issue in blank in financial transactions? What in short was the motive? … The answer is blowing in the wind!
Indeed, this
time around, Manyu has produced a very rare race of (dis)honourable criminal parliamentarians!
No comments:
Post a Comment